原帖报告已收录： 金额与进展来自原帖及关联回复。
Ajay Sohmshetty：Workflows 费用预估邮件显示月费从 $35 涨到 $38,277；Cloudflare 人员称预估有误。
Ajay Sohmshetty（@AjaySohmshetty）贴出 Cloudflare 邮件截图，称账单将从每月 $35 涨到每月 $38,277。他在串文中说明 Workflows 原本只按底层 Worker 的 CPU 时间计费，而计价正转向按 steps 计费。这些数字是该邮件中的费用预估，不是已出账或已扣款金额。mia（@miacmal）公开回复称这是 Cloudflare 方面的错误，将发出更正后的预估；Cloudflare Workflows 工程经理 James Delorey 也回复另一位受影响用户称更新的预估很快发出。
发生了什么
- 报告原因
- 未知
- 事件日期
- 日期未记录
- 首次报告
- 2026-07-16 13:50 UTC
- 账单处置
- 尚无结果记录
- 案例进展
- 尚未确定
- Cloudflare 公开回复
- 已记录人员回复
最新报告进展
$35/月与 $38,277/月来自费用预估邮件而非账单，故不记录报告扣费金额。Cloudflare 人员称预估有误并将发送更正；作者称计价模式仍转向按 steps 计费。尚未收录更正后的数字。
查看时间线中的最新进展原始来源
每项来源链接对应的报告或回复。
案例时间线
作者贴出预估邮件
到 𝕏 阅读作者引用 Cloudflare 邮件称账单将从每月 $35 涨到每月 $38,277。
Ajay Sohmshetty
@AjaySohmshetty · 𝕏 原帖
Woke up to see our @Cloudflare bill going from $35/month ➡️ $38,277/month "uhhh... This feels existential" - @andrewk17 https://t.co/dZSZNY1x7l
作者说明计价变化
到 𝕏 阅读作者称 Workflows 原本只按 Worker CPU 时间计费，现在无预警转向按 steps 计费。
Ajay Sohmshetty
@AjaySohmshetty · 𝕏 原帖
For context- Cloudflare’s durable execution platform, Workflows, originally only charged for underlying Worker usage, which is CPU-time based rather than clock-time based. In fact, we picked Cloudflare for this exact reason: most of our workflows involve waiting (ex. polling, waiting for network requests to come back), so it was far cheaper for us to use Cloudflare than @temporalio or @inngest for instance. These other durable execution platforms also charge based on “steps” - which I always thought was dumb, because it disincentivizes the best practice of decomposing workflows into small units of work in the form of steps. But unfortunately it seems Cloudflare is following suit, without warning… Feeling blindsided after we’ve already fully built all of our durable workflows on Cloudflare
人员称预估有误
到 𝕏 阅读mia（@miacmal）回复：“this was a mistake on our end… we are working to get a corrected estimate sent out as soon as possible”。
mia
@miacmal · 𝕏 原帖
@AjaySohmshetty @Cloudflare @andrewk17 hello, this was a mistake on our end. apologies for the confusion. we are working to get a corrected estimate sent out as soon as possible
作者更新串文
到 𝕏 阅读作者称 Cloudflare 似乎发错了费用预估，但计价模式仍转向按 steps 计费。
Ajay Sohmshetty
@AjaySohmshetty · 𝕏 原帖
Update: it appears that Cloudflare sent incorrect cost estimates. We’ll see what the updated numbers look like, but it doesn’t change the fact that the pricing model has fundamentally shifted to a “steps” based one. Have otherwise had a wonderful experience with Cloudflare so hoping the situation can be rectified for everyone 🙏🏽
工程经理称将发更新预估
到 𝕏 阅读James Delorey 在串中回复另一位用户，称更新的预估很快发出。
James Delorey
@deloreyjmi · 𝕏 原帖
@appfactory @miacmal @AjaySohmshetty @Cloudflare @andrewk17 hey Peter, an updated estimate will be sent out soon. sorry for the scare. feel free to get in touch with Mia or me in the meantime if you have additional questions
其他推荐阅读
预算提醒是喇叭，不是刹车
@GUYUE_LGY 引用 Cloudflare Budget alerts 文档：费用跨过阈值只发邮件，不会暂停或封顶用量。交给 AI 自动运行前，作者只查一件事：到线以后系统究竟做什么。
mcwangcn：bot 攻击后 D1 费用 $1,300。
@mcwangcn 称 D1 写入曾花费上千美元，并另提 Workers CPU 费用但未给金额。他后来晒出 Cloudflare 账单，称 $3,600 中有 $1,300 来自 bot 攻击后的 D1 费用。
把 Cloudflare 控制在 5 美元内：意外账单从哪来
Ashish Sharma（@sarmaasis）用 5 美元的 Workers Paid 方案运行多个网站，按产品列出他认为会悄悄推高 Cloudflare 账单的用法，并附 12 项检查清单。